← All stories
GuideGuide5 min readEdited by

How streaming royalties work: where a Spotify subscription payment actually goes

Spotify pays by share of plays, not per stream, and never pays artists directly. How the pool, the 1,000-stream rule and Deezer's artist-centric model decide who earns what.

How streaming royalties work: where a Spotify subscription payment actually goes

Spotify does not pay per stream. It pays each month, country by country, according to your share of everything played there. If your songs made up 0.1% of Mexican listening in March, you get 0.1% of Spotify's Mexican royalty pool for March. The "rate per stream" you see quoted online is just that pool divided by total plays, worked out afterwards, which is why it moves around and why no honest source can give you one fixed number. Here is how the money travels from a subscriber's card to an artist's bank account, and where it gets stuck on the way.

From $12.99 to the royalty pool

Start with what a listener pays. Spotify says roughly two-thirds of its Premium and advertising revenue goes into the royalty pool, and the rest stays with the company. As an illustration only: of a $12.99 US Individual plan, two-thirds is about $8.66 before tax and before any local differences. That money is not earmarked for the artists the subscriber played. It joins everyone else's money in the pool for that country and month.

Scale gives the pool its weight. Spotify reported paying out more than $11 billion in 2025, and says one in a million of all its streams was worth about $11,000 last year, up from about $1,000 in 2014. That last comparison is worth sitting with: a tiny slice of listening is worth far more than a decade ago, but the slice itself is also harder to win, because the catalogue keeps growing.

Spotify never pays the artist directly

This is the part most explainers skip. Spotify says outright that it does not pay artists or songwriters. It pays rights holders: labels, distributors and collecting societies for the recording, and publishers and societies for the song. Those companies then pay the artist or writer under whatever contract exists, and Spotify cannot see those contracts.

So the same stream creates two payments. One goes to whoever owns the recording, which for a signed artist is usually the label and for a self-releasing artist is the distributor passing money on. The other goes to the songwriting side. An artist who wrote and recorded their own song, and owns both, collects both streams of income. A singer who recorded a song written by someone else, on a label deal that recoups advances first, may see very little for years even when the numbers look large.

Spotify's headline figures need the same care. When it says 1,500 artists earned more than $1 million from Spotify in 2025, or that 13,800 earned $100,000 or more, those are royalties generated on the service across recording and publishing. They are not what landed in anyone's pocket after label, manager and tax.

The 1,000-stream rule and why small tracks get nothing

Since April 2024, a track needs at least 1,000 streams over the previous 12 months before it earns recording royalties on Spotify. It also needs a minimum number of unique listeners, a figure Spotify keeps secret so it cannot be gamed. Publishing royalties are not affected.

Spotify's argument is that tracks under the line account for about 0.5% of all streams, and that payments that small often never reach the artist anyway: distributors and labels set withdrawal minimums, reportedly between $2 and $50, and banks charge fees on top. Critics answer that a rule which moves money from the smallest uploads to everyone above the line still takes from the weakest artists. Both points are fair, and the practical advice is blunt: if you release music yourself, a track that has not reached 1,000 plays in a year is earning nothing on Spotify, so concentrate on a few releases rather than spreading thin.

Spotify also states that streams it detects as artificial earn no royalties. Spotify has also said it can charge labels and distributors where flagrant artificial streaming is detected.

Why Deezer and Tidal are trying other models

The pool system has a known quirk: a listener who plays one jazz album all month contributes to the same pool as a listener who plays a pop hit three hundred times, and the pop artist takes the larger share of both listeners' money. Deezer decided that was a problem. In late 2023 it launched what it calls an artist-centric model with Universal and Warner, under which streams from "professional" artists count double. The announced bar is 1,000 streams a month from at least 500 unique listeners. A second boost applies when a listener actively searches for an artist instead of letting a playlist or autoplay choose.

Deezer is still the only large service to have rebuilt its payment formula this way, and the effect on any given artist depends on who else is in the pool. Tidal has taken a different route this year, aimed at the supply side: since the summer it labels fully AI-generated tracks and does not pay royalties on them. Both moves attack the same weakness, which is that a share-of-plays system rewards whoever can produce the most plays.

Be careful with the per-stream tables floating around the web that rank Tidal first, Apple Music second and Spotify last. They are estimates from distributor statements and blogs, the sources disagree with each other, and none of the services publishes an official rate. Treat any number there as a rough guide rather than a fact.

What to do with this if you are a listener or an artist

If you listen, the most direct way to move money to an artist is still outside the royalty pool: buy the record, buy a ticket, or buy merchandise. Those purchases go to the artist without being divided across a pool, which no stream can match. Inside streaming, Deezer's search boost is the one place where deliberately looking for an artist counts for more than letting autoplay run.

If you make music, three habits pay off. Register your songs with a performing rights organisation and a publishing administrator, because the songwriting income only arrives if someone claims it. Read your distributor's withdrawal minimum before you choose one. And treat your Spotify numbers as a ceiling, not a paycheque: check your own statements for the net figure, since that is the only one that matters. Figures here are as reported by Spotify for 2025 and may change with its next annual report.

More from Lockgroove